Crime shame and reintegration pdf

6.19  ·  9,108 ratings  ·  438 reviews
crime shame and reintegration pdf

john braithwaite - Google Scholar Citations

The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later. Citations per year. Duplicate citations. The following articles are merged in Scholar.
File Name: crime shame and reintegration pdf.zip
Size: 14112 Kb
Published 30.12.2018

What is REINTEGRATIVE SHAMING? What does REINTEGRATIVE SHAMING mean?

Jun 26, Crime, shame and reintegration tegrative shaming will not explain the incidence of their violation. In liberal democracies the crimes that involve.

Reintegrative shaming and restorative justice

In criminology , the reintegrative shaming theory emphasizes the importance of shame in criminal punishment. The theory holds that punishments should focus on the offender 's behavior rather than characteristics of the offender. An example of reintegrative shaming can be found in the case of United States v. Gementera , wherein a year-old mail thief was sentenced to, among other things, wear a sandwich board sign stating, "I stole mail; this is my punishment", while standing outside of a San Francisco postal facility. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. Shaming can be a powerful aspect in the informal process that brings the victim and the offender together in their search for a just restorative solution to their conflict. If, however, it is judged that an offence has to give rise to coercive judicial action, then the role of the justice system must be clearly defined. As far as we can see, it cannot and should not be expected that the judiciary will engage in shaming, nor that the reintegration of the offender should be the principal aim of intervention. Justice should neither shame nor reintegrate, it should simply establish responsibilities and contribute towards the conditions that promote restoration.

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. You're using an out-of-date version of Internet Explorer. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy.

Skip to search form Skip to main content. Whither criminological theory?
best love books for 20 somethings

Conclusion

Eric P. In Crime, Shame, and Reintegration , John Braithwaite argues that communitarian societies are better able than others to reintegrate lawbreakers by shaming the offence without permanently stigmatizing the offender. Although Braithwaite focuses on crime rates, a logical corollary of his argument is that such societies should also exhibit markedly low rates of offender recidivism. In this paper, we examine offender recidivism in Iceland, a country that exhibits many of the social organizational hallmarks of communitarianism and relies heavily on shaming as a method of social control. Following Braithwaite then, Iceland should have a lower rate of recidivism than less socially integrated societies. Contrary to this expectation, results indicate that Icelandic recidivism rates closely approximate those of other nations, many of which are far less communitarian.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Alice H. says:

    (PDF) Crime, Shame, and Reintegration | John Braithwaite - contractorprofitzone.com

  2. Sugniggbrosic says:

    Reintegrative shaming and restorative justice | SpringerLink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *